[Fri Jul 20 10:35:42 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (276.3, 358.6) = 18 56 12.44 1 18 52.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 344.3 +/- 30.8
  Background counts = 298.8
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0007

[Fri Jul 20 10:35:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.64'
[Fri Jul 20 22:33:21 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jul 20 22:33:21 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.75"
[Fri Jul 20 22:33:21 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.832
[Fri Jul 20 22:33:21 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 8.75"
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Sat Jul 21 04:54:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 21 10:08:27 2012] Warning, spatial fit 25 centroid is now closest to src. 88
[Sat Jul 21 10:08:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul 21 10:08:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul 21 10:08:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul 21 10:08:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul 21 10:08:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jul 21 10:08:28 2012] Source is confused with source 22
[Sat Jul 21 18:26:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul 21 18:26:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.75"
[Sat Jul 21 18:26:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.832
[Sat Jul 21 18:26:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 8.75"
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sun Jul 22 02:05:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 22 10:13:28 2012] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 88
[Sun Jul 22 10:13:28 2012] Source 20 is offset by -2.386508 and 3.822690 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.966639 x 0.966639, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jul 22 10:13:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 22 10:13:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 22 10:13:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 22 10:13:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 22 10:13:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 22 20:25:13 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(23993.655823, 31145.856049, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jul 22 20:25:13 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_src.reg
[Sun Jul 22 20:25:13 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (239, 321) - (314, 396)
[Sun Jul 22 20:25:13 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(23993.655823, 31145.856049, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26765.512000, 29316.035600, 2561.504074, 2561.504074, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26406.870361, 30164.854584, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21046.824000, 28968.070000, 1371.128039, 1371.128039, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26996.449800, 29180.151000, 1256.640036, 1256.640036, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24757.227720, 30072.164000, 817.368024, 817.368024, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27440.911700, 29424.801240, 1280.752037, 1280.752037, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26696.306000, 29570.626000, 1313.752038, 1313.752038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21462.434525, 28479.293304, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26425.139618, 30728.525269, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26946.231598, 30559.933563, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24629.448000, 29864.182000, 2526.656073, 2526.656073, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20526.401000, 30214.676000, 1409.104041, 1409.104041, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24593.498627, 31046.178284, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24944.721832, 31146.721588, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21464.760000, 31111.952000, 1485.208043, 1485.208043, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21872.155991, 31739.541840, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26597.326233, 28320.458832, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22824.550842, 31500.214844, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22533.908000, 32669.708000, 2970.416085, 2970.416085, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20946.044000, 30861.144000, 1118.400032, 1118.400032, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24576.032400, 29683.705800, 1291.832037, 1291.832037, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26398.957600, 28998.110000, 1173.000034, 1173.000034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23975.558000, 30042.002000, 2583.664074, 2583.664074, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22653.788000, 29816.067400, 1289.664037, 1289.664037, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jul 22 20:25:13 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20.gif
[Sun Jul 22 20:51:27 2012] Mean detx,y = (-6019.70, 1756.12) 
[Sun Jul 22 20:51:28 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun Jul 22 20:51:43 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun Jul 22 20:51:44 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Jul 22 20:51:44 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun Jul 22 23:01:26 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun Jul 22 23:01:26 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Mon Jul 23 11:54:50 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Mon Jul 23 11:54:50 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_src_b10.pi.gz
[Mon Jul 23 11:54:53 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Mon Jul 23 11:54:53 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00749, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0551060101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20.arf
[Mon Jul 23 11:54:53 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Mon Jul 23 11:54:53 2012] Updating source flux to 9.6e-14
[Mon Jul 23 11:55:13 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting