[Mon Jul 23 17:33:41 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (369.2, 429.1) = 11 45 22.86 2 57 3.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 106.5 +/- 14.2 Background counts = 25.9 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0006 [Mon Jul 23 17:33:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.77' [Mon Jul 23 17:35:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jul 23 17:35:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.81" [Mon Jul 23 17:35:42 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.846 [Mon Jul 23 17:35:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 11.81" [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Jul 23 18:03:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 23 18:19:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 14 [Mon Jul 23 18:19:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jul 23 18:19:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jul 23 18:19:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jul 23 18:19:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jul 23 18:19:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jul 23 18:19:57 2012] Source is confused with source 14 [Mon Jul 23 18:20:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jul 23 18:20:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.81" [Mon Jul 23 18:20:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.846 [Mon Jul 23 18:20:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 11.81" [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv [Mon Jul 23 18:48:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 23 19:03:00 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 384.635000, observed total counts = 336.000000 [Mon Jul 23 19:03:00 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Jul 23 19:03:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jul 23 19:03:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jul 23 19:03:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jul 23 19:03:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jul 23 19:03:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jul 23 19:03:09 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(32073.725067, 37281.034027, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Jul 23 19:03:09 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_src.reg [Mon Jul 23 19:03:09 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (332, 392) - (407, 467) [Mon Jul 23 19:03:09 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(32073.725067, 37281.034027, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(33227.683800, 39262.551800, 403.149612, 403.149612, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32119.418121, 37792.217438, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Jul 23 19:03:09 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7.gif [Mon Jul 23 19:09:21 2012] Mean detx,y = (9179.76, -6511.89) [Mon Jul 23 19:09:24 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Mon Jul 23 19:09:46 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Mon Jul 23 19:09:47 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Jul 23 19:09:47 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_bgd.pi.gz [Mon Jul 23 20:03:11 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Mon Jul 23 20:03:11 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Mon Jul 23 20:24:46 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Mon Jul 23 20:24:46 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Jul 23 20:24:46 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Mon Jul 23 20:24:46 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00488, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0551022701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7.arf [Mon Jul 23 20:24:46 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Mon Jul 23 20:24:46 2012] Updating source flux to 2.4e-14 [Mon Jul 23 20:25:44 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting