[Sun Aug 19 23:13:43 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (345.4, 252.5) = 22 57 7.49 20 43 49.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 54.0 +/- 9.9 Background counts = 21.3 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003 [Sun Aug 19 23:13:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.76' [Mon Aug 20 02:21:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Aug 20 02:21:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.81" [Mon Aug 20 02:21:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.666 [Mon Aug 20 02:21:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 8.81" [Mon Aug 20 04:10:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists [Mon Aug 20 04:10:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv [Mon Aug 20 04:10:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 20 04:10:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv [Mon Aug 20 04:10:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Aug 20 04:10:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists [Mon Aug 20 04:10:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv [Mon Aug 20 04:10:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 20 04:10:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv [Mon Aug 20 04:10:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Aug 20 04:10:46 2012] Warning: source 19 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 22 at 11.562272 pixels away [Mon Aug 20 04:10:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Aug 20 04:10:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Aug 20 04:10:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Aug 20 04:10:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Aug 20 04:10:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Aug 20 06:50:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Aug 20 06:50:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.81" [Mon Aug 20 06:50:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.666 [Mon Aug 20 06:50:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 8.81" [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv [Mon Aug 20 08:29:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Aug 20 08:30:03 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 253.608000, observed total counts = 208.000000 [Mon Aug 20 08:30:03 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 22 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Mon Aug 20 08:30:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Aug 20 08:30:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Aug 20 08:30:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Aug 20 08:30:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Aug 20 08:30:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Aug 20 10:22:18 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(29998.410797, 21914.936478, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Aug 20 10:22:18 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22_src.reg [Mon Aug 20 10:22:18 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (308, 215) - (383, 290) [Mon Aug 20 10:22:18 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(29998.410797, 21914.936478, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28631.055000, 20639.061200, 392.171211, 392.171211, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon Aug 20 10:22:18 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22.gif [Mon Aug 20 10:30:50 2012] Mean detx,y = (6295.24, 745.15) [Mon Aug 20 10:30:52 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Mon Aug 20 10:31:21 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Mon Aug 20 10:31:21 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Aug 20 10:31:21 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22_bgd.pi.gz [Mon Aug 20 11:03:13 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 54 counts [Mon Aug 20 11:03:13 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Mon Aug 20 11:07:15 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Mon Aug 20 11:07:15 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon Aug 20 11:07:17 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Mon Aug 20 11:07:17 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0016, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0551020901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src22.arf [Mon Aug 20 11:07:17 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Mon Aug 20 11:07:17 2012] Updating source flux to 3.2e-14 [Mon Aug 20 11:09:09 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting