[Sat Jul  7 14:40:36 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (314.2, 298.1) = 18 52 29.81 0 41 41.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 102.8 +/- 18.4
  Background counts = 67.4
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Sat Jul  7 14:40:36 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.14'
[Sat Jul  7 15:11:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul  7 15:11:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.00"
[Sat Jul  7 15:11:30 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.899
[Sat Jul  7 15:11:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 0, mean size = 7.00"
[Sat Jul  7 18:01:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 18:01:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Sat Jul  7 18:01:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 18:01:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.csv
[Sat Jul  7 18:01:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul  7 18:01:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 18:01:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 18:01:01 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src33 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jul  7 20:07:35 2012] Source 25 is offset by -5.145585 and 5.486030 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.563265 x 0.831756, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jul  7 20:07:35 2012] Warning, spatial fit 33 centroid is now closest to src. 19
[Sat Jul  7 20:07:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul  7 20:07:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul  7 20:07:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul  7 20:07:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul  7 20:07:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jul  7 20:07:35 2012] Source is confused with source 27
[Sat Jul  7 20:35:21 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul  7 20:35:21 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.00"
[Sat Jul  7 20:35:21 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.899
[Sat Jul  7 20:35:21 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 1, mean size = 7.00"
[Sat Jul  7 23:28:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 23:28:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.csv
[Sat Jul  7 23:28:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 23:28:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.csv
[Sat Jul  7 23:28:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul  7 23:28:03 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 23:28:03 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul  7 23:28:03 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0550671101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Warning: source 18 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 25 at 29.512297 pixels away
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1158.960000, observed total counts = 1156.000000
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 7.209684 pixels
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 30 to 29
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] 1117.887500 total counts/ 1029.980000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.739123
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 7.209684 pixels
  Position = (318.9, 292.7) = 18 52 28.46 0 41 15.8
  Extent = 14.5 (14.4-28.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 87.9 +/- 33.4
  Background counts = 1030.0
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.002
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1042.100000, observed total counts = 1038.000000
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 2.759279 pixels
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 29 to 41
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] 934.703100 total counts/ 871.359000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.145891
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 25 = 2.759279 pixels
  Position = (319.2, 295.4) = 18 52 28.38 0 41 27.8
  Extent = 10.6 (2.0-14.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 63.3 +/- 30.6
  Background counts = 871.4
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.002
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul  8 01:55:48 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0