[Wed Aug 22 15:36:11 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (384.5, 276.1) = 12 28 33.26 13 58 44.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 55.2 +/- 9.6
  Background counts = 10.6
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0008

[Wed Aug 22 15:36:11 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.45'
[Wed Aug 22 16:33:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.65 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 22 16:33:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.65"
[Wed Aug 22 16:33:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.981
[Wed Aug 22 16:33:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 9.65"
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 22 16:58:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 22 17:31:37 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 178.104000, observed total counts = 134.000000
[Wed Aug 22 17:31:37 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Aug 22 17:31:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 22 17:31:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 22 17:31:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug 22 17:31:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 22 17:31:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 22 18:22:46 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.65 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 22 18:22:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.65"
[Wed Aug 22 18:22:46 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.981
[Wed Aug 22 18:22:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 9.65"
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 22 18:39:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 22 19:06:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 178.037000, observed total counts = 134.000000
[Wed Aug 22 19:06:31 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Aug 22 19:06:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 22 19:06:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 22 19:06:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug 22 19:06:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 22 19:06:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 22 19:36:03 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(33402.681396, 23968.332153, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Wed Aug 22 19:36:03 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg
[Wed Aug 22 19:36:03 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (347, 239) - (422, 314)
[Wed Aug 22 19:36:03 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(33402.681396, 23968.332153, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Wed Aug 22 19:36:03 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif
[Wed Aug 22 19:36:47 2012] Mean detx,y = (3476.09, -7446.37) 
[Wed Aug 22 19:36:48 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Wed Aug 22 19:37:08 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Wed Aug 22 19:37:08 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed Aug 22 19:37:08 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz
[Wed Aug 22 19:53:55 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 55 counts
[Wed Aug 22 19:53:55 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Wed Aug 22 20:19:01 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Wed Aug 22 20:19:01 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed Aug 22 20:19:01 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Wed Aug 22 20:19:01 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00485, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0550540201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf
[Wed Aug 22 20:19:01 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Wed Aug 22 20:19:01 2012] Updating source flux to 7.5e-14
[Wed Aug 22 20:19:03 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting