[Tue May 29 19:11:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (355.1, 364.0) = 18 13 3.68 -57 37 11.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 97.0 +/- 13.9
  Background counts = 25.8
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.0009

[Tue May 29 19:11:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.28'
[Tue May 29 19:39:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 29 19:39:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.57"
[Tue May 29 19:39:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.234
[Tue May 29 19:39:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 9.57"
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 20:01:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 20:25:03 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 323.026000, observed total counts = 253.000000
[Tue May 29 20:25:03 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 29 20:25:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 29 20:25:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 29 20:25:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 29 20:25:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 29 20:25:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 29 20:57:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 29 20:57:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.57"
[Tue May 29 20:57:00 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.234
[Tue May 29 20:57:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 9.57"
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue May 29 21:20:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 29 21:43:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 323.712000, observed total counts = 253.000000
[Tue May 29 21:43:26 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 29 21:43:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 29 21:43:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 29 21:43:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 29 21:43:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 29 21:43:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 29 22:05:51 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(30844.836792, 31621.995728, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue May 29 22:05:51 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src.reg
[Tue May 29 22:05:51 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (318, 327) - (393, 402)
[Tue May 29 22:05:51 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(30844.836792, 31621.995728, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y)
[Tue May 29 22:05:51 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.gif
[Tue May 29 22:07:02 2012] Mean detx,y = (-6081.67, -7283.76) 
[Tue May 29 22:07:03 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Tue May 29 22:07:16 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Tue May 29 22:07:16 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue May 29 22:07:16 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_bgd.pi.gz
[Tue May 29 22:16:46 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 96 counts
[Tue May 29 22:16:46 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Tue May 29 22:28:09 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Tue May 29 22:28:09 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5_src_b10.pi.gz
[Tue May 29 22:28:09 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Tue May 29 22:28:09 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00628, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0550460601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src5.arf
[Tue May 29 22:28:09 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Tue May 29 22:28:09 2012] Updating source flux to 1e-13
[Tue May 29 22:28:10 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting