[Fri Jun 15 10:10:16 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (419.7, 145.1) = 16 37 50.27 -21 4 58.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 45.5 +/- 8.7 Background counts = 4.0 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007 [Fri Jun 15 10:10:16 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.17' [Fri Jun 15 11:28:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jun 15 11:28:29 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Fri Jun 15 11:28:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.52" [Fri Jun 15 11:28:29 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.076 [Fri Jun 15 11:28:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 13.52" [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Fri Jun 15 11:47:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 15 11:47:28 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 98.083400, observed total counts = 88.000000 [Fri Jun 15 11:47:28 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Jun 15 11:47:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jun 15 11:47:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jun 15 11:47:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jun 15 11:47:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jun 15 11:47:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jun 15 13:03:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.52 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jun 15 13:03:48 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Fri Jun 15 13:03:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.52" [Fri Jun 15 13:03:48 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.076 [Fri Jun 15 13:03:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 13.52" [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv [Fri Jun 15 13:08:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0550451301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jun 15 13:09:00 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 9 [Fri Jun 15 13:09:00 2012] Warning, spatial fit 18 centroid is now closest to src. 16 [Fri Jun 15 13:09:00 2012] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 16 [Fri Jun 15 13:09:02 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 100.590000, observed total counts = 88.000000 [Fri Jun 15 13:09:02 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Jun 15 13:09:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jun 15 13:09:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jun 15 13:09:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jun 15 13:09:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jun 15 13:09:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Jun 15 13:09:02 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9