[Sun Sep  2 19:21:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (221.6, 354.6) = 18 17 19.38 -25 51 7.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 46.2 +/- 10.6
  Background counts = 27.8
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Sun Sep  2 19:21:53 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.90'
[Sun Sep  2 19:23:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Sep  2 19:23:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.88"
[Sun Sep  2 19:23:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.814
[Sun Sep  2 19:23:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 9.88"
[Sun Sep  2 19:42:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 19:42:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Sun Sep  2 19:42:23 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 19:42:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Sun Sep  2 19:42:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Sep  2 19:42:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 19:42:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 19:42:24 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:24 2012] Warning: source 8 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 10.714962 pixels away
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.88"
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.814
[Sun Sep  2 20:09:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 9.88"
[Sun Sep  2 20:23:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 20:23:00 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 20:23:00 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8 appears to have run properly
[Sun Sep  2 20:23:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 20:23:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sun Sep  2 20:23:01 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0550190201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Sun Sep  2 20:49:36 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 333.606000, observed total counts = 334.000000
[Sun Sep  2 20:49:36 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.512500 pixels
[Sun Sep  2 20:49:36 2012] 333.355200 total counts/ 311.216000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.254963
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.512500 pixels
  Position = (221.6, 355.1) = 18 17 19.40 -25 51 7.5
  Extent = 3.2 (2.5-6.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 22.1 +/- 18.3
  Background counts = 311.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability