[Mon Jul  9 16:51:44 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (381.1, 302.2) = 21 6 20.79 38 46 47.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 37.3 +/- 9.1
  Background counts = 12.2
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.002

[Mon Jul  9 16:51:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.00'
[Mon Jul  9 16:52:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul  9 16:52:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.43"
[Mon Jul  9 16:52:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.054
[Mon Jul  9 16:52:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 9.43"
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 157.459000, observed total counts = 132.000000
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.43"
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:37 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.054
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 9.43"
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 158.002000, observed total counts = 132.000000
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9