[Mon Jul  9 16:51:44 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (313.6, 132.6) = 21 6 45.92 38 34 32.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 36.4 +/- 8.2
  Background counts = 10.6
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Mon Jul  9 16:51:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.07'
[Mon Jul  9 16:52:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul  9 16:52:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.47"
[Mon Jul  9 16:52:55 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.728
[Mon Jul  9 16:52:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 12.47"
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:09:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 14.887925 pixels away
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.47"
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:37 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.728
[Mon Jul  9 17:34:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 12.47"
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0550060801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 4 at 16.911281 pixels away
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul  9 18:12:36 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9