[Wed Jun 12 05:19:32 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.4, 147.8) = 7 8 19.92 -49 43 51.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 128.9 +/- 24.6
  Background counts = 216.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Wed Jun 12 05:19:33 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.07'
[Wed Jun 12 05:26:24 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 12 05:26:24 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.47"
[Wed Jun 12 05:26:24 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.081
[Wed Jun 12 05:26:24 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 12.47"
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:07 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:08 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:39 2013] Warning: source 1 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 11.151206 pixels away
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:39 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1866.190000, observed total counts = 1647.000000
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:39 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 23
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:40 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:40 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:40 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:40 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:40 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.47"
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:57 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.081
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 12.47"
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:32 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:32 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:32 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:33 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:33 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:33 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:23 2013] Warning: source 1 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 11.151206 pixels away
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:23 2013] Warning, spatial fit 21 centroid is now closest to src. 1
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:23 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:23 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:23 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:23 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:23 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:23 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0