[Wed Jun 12 05:19:54 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (317.8, 202.5) = 7 8 43.06 -49 39 49.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 153.3 +/- 16.3
  Background counts = 117.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0003

[Wed Jun 12 05:19:54 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.10'
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:08 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:08 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.98"
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:08 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.737
[Wed Jun 12 06:38:08 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 9.98"
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 12 07:03:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:43 2013] Source 15 is offset by 4.475510 and -5.496514 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.116212 x 3.116212, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:43 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:43 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:43 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:43 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 12 08:01:43 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:33 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:33 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.98"
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:33 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.737
[Wed Jun 12 09:05:33 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 9.98"
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Wed Jun 12 09:18:38 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0511580301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:26 2013] Source 15 is offset by 2.869781 and -5.246307 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.002506 x 2.002506, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 12 10:22:26 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9