[Sat Mar 10 11:43:26 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (286.0, 333.2) = 7 8 57.75 -49 30 18.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 172.3 +/- 27.8
  Background counts = 331.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sat Mar 10 11:43:26 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.68'
[Sat Mar 10 11:56:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 10 11:56:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.77"
[Sat Mar 10 11:56:17 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.766
[Sat Mar 10 11:56:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 38 for pass 0, mean size = 7.77"
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src38.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src38.csv
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src38_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src38.csv
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src38_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src38.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src38.csv
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src38.csv
[Sat Mar 10 15:32:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src38_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src38.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:37 2012] Source 39 is offset by 1.055561 and -7.138462 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.333664 x 2.333664, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 18:23:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 10 18:23:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.77"
[Sat Mar 10 18:23:16 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.766
[Sat Mar 10 18:23:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 37 for pass 1, mean size = 7.77"
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.csv
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.csv
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37.csv
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37.csv
[Sat Mar 10 20:27:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:14 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2242.750000, observed total counts = 1906.000000
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:14 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 39
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:34 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(24837.023224, 28940.195770, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:34 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src39_src.reg
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:34 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (249, 296) - (324, 371)
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:34 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(24837.023224, 28940.195770, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27984.228160, 25589.114200, 1582.977420, 1582.977420, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:34 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src39.gif
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:04 2012] Mean detx,y = (-4343.94, 1126.54) 
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:10 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:32 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:32 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src39_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Mar 10 23:47:32 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src39_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun Mar 11 01:31:15 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun Mar 11 01:31:15 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Mar 11 04:51:10 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Mar 11 04:51:10 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src39_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Mar 11 04:51:13 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Mar 11 04:51:13 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00193, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src39.arf
[Sun Mar 11 04:51:13 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Mar 11 04:51:14 2012] Updating source flux to 6.8e-15
[Sun Mar 11 04:55:22 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting