[Sat Mar 10 11:44:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (252.2, 473.2) = 7 9 12.80 -49 20 7.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 120.4 +/- 17.2
  Background counts = 44.5
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0001

[Sat Mar 10 11:44:59 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.10'
[Sat Mar 10 16:51:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 10 16:51:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.98"
[Sat Mar 10 16:51:07 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 44, frac = 0.906
[Sat Mar 10 16:51:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 0, mean size = 12.98"
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:58 2012] Warning: source 30 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 16.048359 pixels away
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 18:22:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 21:23:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.98 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar 10 21:23:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.98"
[Sat Mar 10 21:23:22 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 44, frac = 0.906
[Sat Mar 10 21:23:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 12.98"
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511580101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:23 2012] Warning: source 22 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 16.164128 pixels away
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:23 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:23 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:23 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:23 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:23 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar 10 22:15:23 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9