[Thu May  3 17:40:42 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (388.0, 337.0) = 0 24 35.45 64 10 15.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 376.2 +/- 36.3
  Background counts = 267.2
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Thu May  3 17:40:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.07'
[Thu May  3 18:07:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 18:07:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.96"
[Thu May  3 18:07:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.156
[Thu May  3 18:07:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 9.96"
[Sat May 12 14:11:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 14:11:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sat May 12 14:11:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 14:11:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sat May 12 14:11:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 14:11:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 14:11:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 14:11:44 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89 appears to have run properly