[Thu May  3 17:40:36 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (318.1, 269.0) = 0 25 21.97 64 5 20.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 25564.4 +/- 203.0
  Background counts = 368.4
  Rate = 1 +/- 0.01

[Thu May  3 17:40:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.57'
[Thu May  3 18:07:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  3 18:07:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.71"
[Thu May  3 18:07:41 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.774
[Thu May  3 18:07:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 49 for pass 0, mean size = 7.71"
[Sat May 12 14:11:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 14:11:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.csv
[Sat May 12 14:11:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 14:11:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.csv
[Sat May 12 14:11:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src49.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 12 14:11:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 14:11:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 12 14:11:43 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0511180101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src49 appears to have run properly