[Mon Mar 19 14:27:17 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (443.7, 250.8) = 18 19 50.14 -14 39 14.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 61.3 +/- 11.0 Background counts = 25.6 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001 [Mon Mar 19 14:27:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.08' [Mon Mar 19 14:30:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Mar 19 14:30:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.97" [Mon Mar 19 14:30:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.686 [Mon Mar 19 14:30:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 0, mean size = 11.97" [Mon Mar 19 22:58:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 22:58:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv [Mon Mar 19 22:58:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 22:58:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv [Mon Mar 19 22:58:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Mar 19 22:58:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 22:58:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.csv [Mon Mar 19 22:58:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists [Mon Mar 19 22:58:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.csv [Mon Mar 19 22:58:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 396.955000, observed total counts = 400.000000 [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 0.090406 pixels [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 85 to 83 [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] 335.537300 total counts/ 299.627000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.074572 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 0.090406 pixels Position = (443.6, 250.8) = 18 19 50.17 -14 39 15.0 Extent = 3.0" x 3.0", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 35.9 +/- 18.3 Background counts = 299.6 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.002 [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Source is confused with source 90 [Tue Mar 20 15:36:42 2012] Source is confused with source 91 [Tue Mar 20 15:38:24 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 20 15:38:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 3.04" [Tue Mar 20 15:38:24 2012] source mask rpix=0.7, npix_max = 5, mask sum = 6, frac = 1.043 [Tue Mar 20 15:38:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 1, mean size = 3.04" [Wed Mar 21 00:51:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg exists [Wed Mar 21 00:51:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv [Wed Mar 21 00:51:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 21 00:51:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv [Wed Mar 21 00:51:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 21 00:51:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists [Wed Mar 21 00:51:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv [Wed Mar 21 00:51:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 21 00:51:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv [Wed Mar 21 00:51:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 21 18:09:47 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 399.292000, observed total counts = 400.000000 [Wed Mar 21 18:09:47 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 0.079849 pixels [Wed Mar 21 18:09:47 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 81 to 79 [Wed Mar 21 18:09:47 2012] 378.656500 total counts/ 344.772000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.824883 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 89 = 0.079849 pixels Position = (443.7, 250.8) = 18 19 50.15 -14 39 15.3 Extent = 3.0" x 3.0", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 33.9 +/- 19.5 Background counts = 344.8 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.002 [Wed Mar 21 18:09:47 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Mar 21 18:09:47 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Mar 21 18:09:47 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Mar 21 18:09:47 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Mar 21 18:09:47 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 21 18:11:38 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(38552.456000, 21768.454000, 182.478005, 182.478005, 0.000000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 21 18:11:38 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src.reg [Wed Mar 21 18:11:38 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (433, 240) - (454, 261) [Wed Mar 21 18:11:38 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(38552.456000, 21768.454000, 304.130009, 608.260018, X, Y) && !ellipse(39434.408200, 24243.803600, 1944.192056, 243.024007, 42.968000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37478.044000, 19994.776000, 1856.368053, 1856.368053, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37009.810000, 23095.676000, 1760.072051, 1760.072051, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38697.500122, 22844.917572, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37587.128269, 22628.009232, 2017.616058, 252.201607, 44.415273, X, Y) && !ellipse(39230.011383, 22411.388458, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39561.882080, 22058.735519, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40016.111082, 21774.688908, 2263.960065, 282.995208, 217.575499, X, Y) && !ellipse(38936.577545, 21498.430084, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37086.138800, 20375.211200, 1263.104036, 235.417607, 39.964000, X, Y) [Wed Mar 21 18:11:38 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89.gif [Wed Mar 21 19:36:06 2012] Mean detx,y = (11736.58, 5127.33) [Wed Mar 21 19:36:10 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Wed Mar 21 19:36:34 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Wed Mar 21 19:36:35 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src_b10.pi.gz [Wed Mar 21 19:36:35 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_bgd.pi.gz [Wed Mar 21 22:22:45 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 33 counts [Wed Mar 21 22:22:45 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Thu Mar 22 05:08:13 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Thu Mar 22 05:08:13 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89_src_b10.pi.gz [Thu Mar 22 05:08:19 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Thu Mar 22 05:08:19 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00363, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src89.arf [Thu Mar 22 05:08:19 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Thu Mar 22 05:08:19 2012] Updating source flux to 3.5e-14 [Thu Mar 22 05:25:47 2012] Flag c found in src. 89 procflags, skipping spectral fitting [Thu Mar 22 05:25:47 2012] Source 89 has fewer than 100.000000 counts, skipping spectral fitting