[Mon Mar 19 14:27:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (329.9, 347.9) = 18 20 24.28 -14 32 14.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 62.8 +/- 11.5
  Background counts = 16.8
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Mon Mar 19 14:27:38 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.25'
[Tue Mar 20 05:26:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 20 05:26:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.55"
[Tue Mar 20 05:26:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.027
[Tue Mar 20 05:26:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 8.55"
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Warning, spatial fit 89 centroid is now closest to src. 58
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Warning: source 96 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 16.332656 pixels away
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Source is confused with source 58
[Wed Mar 21 07:06:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 21 07:06:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.55"
[Wed Mar 21 07:06:27 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.027
[Wed Mar 21 07:06:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 1, mean size = 8.55"
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.csv
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:05 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:42 2012] Warning: source 81 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 11.010247 pixels away
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28649.175354, 30221.573975, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src62_src.reg
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (292, 310) - (367, 385)
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28649.175354, 30221.573975, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26950.198200, 27608.188000, 481.158414, 337.092010, 15.978209, X, Y) && !ellipse(30941.882000, 32766.584000, 540.632816, 540.632816, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30903.320000, 33038.132000, 1033.536030, 1033.536030, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31705.658000, 30880.848000, 1354.160039, 1354.160039, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29064.958200, 31766.191800, 510.291215, 510.291215, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28806.281589, 32592.440905, 1513.608044, 285.172489, 71.999530, X, Y) && !ellipse(29929.921800, 29607.960000, 1386.424040, 672.700019, 90.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29946.061000, 29385.348000, 1235.256036, 1235.256036, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30573.806091, 28227.660248, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29550.202600, 30470.046000, 661.284819, 661.284819, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27790.745972, 32748.495453, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28135.222748, 31443.869812, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29496.917600, 28345.123800, 268.160008, 268.160008, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28472.873444, 30669.758850, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29418.846200, 30833.704000, 1211.072035, 363.791210, 90.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28932.918320, 32193.761600, 1495.416043, 277.064008, 72.211000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28314.280579, 31078.351929, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29276.901276, 28845.684692, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src62.gif
[Thu Mar 22 01:48:43 2012] Mean detx,y = (-1307.81, 2814.61) 
[Thu Mar 22 01:48:45 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Thu Mar 22 01:48:58 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Thu Mar 22 01:48:59 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src62_src_b10.pi.gz
[Thu Mar 22 01:48:59 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src62_bgd.pi.gz
[Thu Mar 22 04:49:32 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 62 counts
[Thu Mar 22 04:49:32 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:35 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:35 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src62_src_b10.pi.gz
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:40 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:40 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00657, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src62.arf
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:40 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:40 2012] Updating source flux to 8e-14
[Thu Mar 22 05:15:35 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting