[Mon Mar 19 14:27:29 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (306.5, 504.1) = 18 20 31.27 -14 20 53.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 97.2 +/- 13.5
  Background counts = 9.1
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.001

[Mon Mar 19 14:27:38 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.92'
[Tue Mar 20 05:26:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 20 05:26:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.89"
[Tue Mar 20 05:26:48 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.027
[Tue Mar 20 05:26:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 72 for pass 0, mean size = 13.89"
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.csv
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.csv
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:03 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:03 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.csv
[Tue Mar 20 15:36:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src72.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Source 3 is offset by 1.589122 and -5.992473 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.570230 x 1.570230, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Warning, spatial fit 72 centroid is now closest to src. 2
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 20 15:37:39 2012] Source is confused with source 4
[Wed Mar 21 07:06:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar 21 07:06:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.89"
[Wed Mar 21 07:06:27 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.027
[Wed Mar 21 07:06:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 66 for pass 1, mean size = 13.89"
[Wed Mar 21 18:08:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 21 18:08:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.csv
[Wed Mar 21 18:08:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 21 18:08:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.csv
[Wed Mar 21 18:08:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:04 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.csv
[Wed Mar 21 18:09:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src66.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:42 2012] Source 3 is offset by 1.589122 and -5.992473 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.570230 x 1.570230, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:42 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 7444.980000, observed total counts = 298.000000
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:42 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 3
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Source 3 is offset by 9.429926 and -3.027990 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.949669 x 0.949669, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar 21 18:10:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26619.373596, 43805.534882, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src3_src.reg
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (269, 467) - (344, 542)
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26619.373596, 43805.534882, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29454.703278, 42325.990601, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27652.615417, 43186.206818, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27859.418304, 43791.633148, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29509.577000, 42852.852000, 1666.136048, 361.772810, 97.772610, X, Y) && !ellipse(27552.602000, 42040.740000, 731.960821, 731.960821, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27539.135080, 41575.131800, 2064.720059, 551.681616, 89.464828, X, Y) && !ellipse(27550.814000, 41277.674000, 959.968028, 959.968028, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26386.767800, 41739.979400, 1070.800031, 1070.800031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26457.280600, 42892.714000, 927.688027, 927.688027, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26495.381534, 40804.404170, 2616.400075, 631.191732, 90.002999, X, Y) && !ellipse(26409.578491, 42052.857117, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26504.984400, 43214.341440, 473.058414, 473.058414, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24978.153961, 42819.337524, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25111.029600, 43413.196000, 2157.224062, 1135.456033, 95.455470, X, Y) && !ellipse(24905.928000, 41950.628200, 773.967222, 773.967222, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24915.731567, 41015.778778, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Thu Mar 22 01:08:09 2012] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src3.gif
[Thu Mar 22 01:41:10 2012] Mean detx,y = (1402.13, 16163.91) 
[Thu Mar 22 01:41:12 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Thu Mar 22 01:41:32 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Thu Mar 22 01:41:32 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src3_src_b10.pi.gz
[Thu Mar 22 01:41:32 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src3_bgd.pi.gz
[Thu Mar 22 04:30:51 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 97 counts
[Thu Mar 22 04:30:51 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:34 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:34 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src3_src_b10.pi.gz
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:39 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:39 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00891, arf fullrun_mos2_xmm0511010101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src3.arf
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:39 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Thu Mar 22 05:08:39 2012] Updating source flux to 3.1e-13
[Thu Mar 22 05:15:35 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting