[Thu Jun 13 12:45:55 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (339.0, 325.1) = 17 45 30.87 -28 59 35.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 55.9 +/- 11.4
  Background counts = 38.6
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Thu Jun 13 12:45:55 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.52'
[Thu Jun 13 12:47:12 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 13 12:47:12 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.19"
[Thu Jun 13 12:47:12 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.705
[Thu Jun 13 12:47:12 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 8.19"
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:04 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:04 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:05 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:05 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Thu Jun 13 13:37:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:34 2013] Source 11 is offset by -1.332799 and 2.404378 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.010515 x 7.528690, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:34 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:34 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:34 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:34 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:34 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:34 2013] Source is confused with source 12
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:45 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:45 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.19"
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:45 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.705
[Thu Jun 13 14:28:45 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 8.19"
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Thu Jun 13 15:19:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 13 16:06:53 2013] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 12
[Thu Jun 13 16:06:53 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 13 16:06:53 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 13 16:06:53 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 13 16:06:53 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 13 16:06:53 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 13 16:06:53 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0