[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.3, 161.1) = 17 46 20.05 -28 50 14.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 57.8 +/- 11.3
  Background counts = 20.4
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.21'
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.03"
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.703
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 12.03"
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.03 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.03"
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.703
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 12.03"
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 15.495584 pixels away
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9