[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (368.1, 188.8) = 17 46 20.48 -28 48 13.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 51.7 +/- 10.3
  Background counts = 23.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.41'
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.14"
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.828
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 11.14"
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source 22 is offset by -8.889123 and -1.226752 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.243246 x 1.243246, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Warning, spatial fit 22 centroid is now closest to src. 1
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 359.148000, observed total counts = 312.000000
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 22
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.14"
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 31, frac = 0.828
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 11.14"
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source 22 is offset by -8.889123 and -1.226752 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.243246 x 1.243246, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 363.947000, observed total counts = 316.000000
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 22
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9