[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (365.1, 270.9) = 17 46 21.47 -28 42 15.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 69.0 +/- 13.2
  Background counts = 28.4
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.004

[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.23'
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.04"
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.714
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 9.04"
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source 16 is offset by -7.197157 and -6.775041 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.039503 x 1.039503, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 16 at 10.926729 pixels away
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.04"
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.714
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 9.04"
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 11 centroid is now closest to src. 15
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9