[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (364.9, 299.8) = 17 46 21.56 -28 40 6.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 59.4 +/- 11.2
  Background counts = 22.9
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.004

[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.82'
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.84"
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.741
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 8.84"
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 423.002000, observed total counts = 325.000000
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source is confused with source 14
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.84 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.84"
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.741
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 8.84"
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 12
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9