[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (364.5, 310.0) = 17 46 21.68 -28 39 22.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 54.7 +/- 10.7
  Background counts = 20.2
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Mon May 28 05:03:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.86'
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.86"
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.699
[Mon May 28 05:04:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 8.86"
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Mon May 28 05:54:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source 12 is offset by -7.627239 and -2.823109 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.018469 x 8.147770, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Warning, spatial fit 12 centroid is now closest to src. 11
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 06:12:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.86"
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.699
[Mon May 28 06:12:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 8.86"
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.csv
[Mon May 28 07:04:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0511000201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 7 centroid is now closest to src. 11
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source 12 is offset by -7.605814 and 1.902822 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.015793 x 1.015793, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 28 07:25:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9