[Tue Jul 24 02:22:02 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (342.7, 312.6) = 8 35 4.49 -45 11 2.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 217.4 +/- 24.4 Background counts = 524.0 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Tue Jul 24 02:22:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.37' [Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.11" [Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.849 [Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 8.11" [Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv [Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.csv [Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv [Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.csv [Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Source 7 is offset by -6.494366 and -7.048980 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.713623 x 2.713623, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.11" [Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.849 [Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 8.11" [Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv [Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv [Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv [Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv [Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Source 7 is offset by -6.938160 and -7.082521 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 3.188575 x 3.188575, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9