[Tue Jul 24 02:22:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (370.0, 287.9) = 8 34 53.27 -45 12 58.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 219.3 +/- 31.2
  Background counts = 448.9
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Tue Jul 24 02:22:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.24'
[Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.05"
[Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.127
[Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 9.05"
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3643.940000, observed total counts = 3123.000000
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.05"
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.127
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 9.05"
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Warning: source 10 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 11.664422 pixels away
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9