[Tue Jul 24 02:22:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (282.3, 296.7) = 8 35 29.36 -45 12 14.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 235.8 +/- 27.1
  Background counts = 443.2
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001

[Tue Jul 24 02:22:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.18'
[Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.02"
[Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.560
[Tue Jul 24 02:25:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 7.02"
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Jul 24 03:18:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 12
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:02 2012] Source is confused with source 5
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.02"
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.560
[Tue Jul 24 03:23:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 7.02"
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Jul 24 04:54:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Source 10 is offset by 6.726732 and 5.583828 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.331862 x 6.331862, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 24 05:00:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9