[Mon Jun  4 11:41:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (308.9, 221.1) = 8 35 14.48 -45 14 32.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 133.2 +/- 26.8
  Background counts = 312.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Mon Jun  4 11:41:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.66'
[Mon Jun  4 11:48:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  4 11:48:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.26"
[Mon Jun  4 11:48:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.050
[Mon Jun  4 11:48:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 9.26"
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Mon Jun  4 20:20:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:16 2012] Source 22 is offset by -1.827633 and -9.372875 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 8.511357 x 8.511357, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:16 2012] Source is confused with source 6
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.26"
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.050
[Tue Jun  5 07:03:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 9.26"
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue Jun  5 08:35:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0510390301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 17:32:31 2012] Source 22 is offset by 6.494292 and -7.213289 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 8.511357 x 1.063917, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  5 17:32:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  5 17:32:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  5 17:32:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  5 17:32:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  5 17:32:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  5 17:32:31 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9