[Tue Jun  5 07:29:05 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (316.4, 351.8) = 8 35 15.29 -45 8 19.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 94.6 +/- 22.8
  Background counts = 202.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Tue Jun  5 07:29:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.08'
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.47"
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.044
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 8.47"
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:17 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:31 2012] Source 16 is offset by 0.725690 and 8.998469 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.658409 x 1.658409, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:31 2012] Source 16 is offset by 8.187897 and 5.180906 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.973572 x 0.973572, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:31 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9