[Tue Jun 5 07:29:05 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (331.8, 210.7) = 8 35 8.91 -45 18 33.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 91.1 +/- 21.6 Background counts = 177.9 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007 [Tue Jun 5 07:29:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.81' [Tue Jun 5 16:28:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jun 5 16:28:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.83" [Tue Jun 5 16:28:19 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.984 [Tue Jun 5 16:28:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 9.83" [Tue Jun 5 17:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists [Tue Jun 5 17:44:17 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Tue Jun 5 17:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 5 17:44:17 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Tue Jun 5 17:44:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jun 5 17:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Tue Jun 5 17:44:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 5 17:44:17 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly [Tue Jun 5 17:44:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2070.020000, observed total counts = 2070.000000 [Tue Jun 5 17:44:31 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 1.594801 pixels [Tue Jun 5 17:44:31 2012] 2076.570000 total counts/ 1918.760000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.602668 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 1.594801 pixels Position = (333.1, 211.6) = 8 35 8.38 -45 18 30.2 Extent = 14.0 (3.7-19.7)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 157.8 +/- 45.6 Background counts = 1918.8 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.001 [Tue Jun 5 17:44:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jun 5 17:44:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jun 5 17:44:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Tue Jun 5 17:44:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jun 5 17:44:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jun 5 18:30:26 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jun 5 18:30:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.04" [Tue Jun 5 18:30:26 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.007 [Tue Jun 5 18:30:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 14.04" [Tue Jun 5 19:11:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Tue Jun 5 19:11:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 5 19:11:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly [Tue Jun 5 19:11:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Tue Jun 5 19:11:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Tue Jun 5 19:11:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Tue Jun 5 19:11:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 5 [Tue Jun 5 19:11:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jun 5 19:11:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jun 5 19:11:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Tue Jun 5 19:11:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jun 5 19:11:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jun 5 19:11:46 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9