[Tue Jun  5 07:28:35 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (334.8, 336.9) = 8 35 7.72 -45 9 22.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 155.1 +/- 25.9
  Background counts = 241.3
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0006

[Tue Jun  5 07:28:35 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.84'
[Tue Jun  5 07:57:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun  5 07:57:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.35"
[Tue Jun  5 07:57:47 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.854
[Tue Jun  5 07:57:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 8.35"
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jun  5 16:28:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:26 2012] Source 14 is offset by 7.486679 and 6.306713 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.098835 x 7.098835, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  5 17:44:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  5 17:57:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun  5 17:57:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.35"
[Tue Jun  5 17:57:45 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.854
[Tue Jun  5 17:57:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 8.35"
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Tue Jun  5 18:30:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0510390101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun  5 19:11:43 2012] Source 14 is offset by 7.486679 and 6.200529 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.668058 x 6.668058, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun  5 19:11:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun  5 19:11:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun  5 19:11:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun  5 19:11:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun  5 19:11:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun  5 19:11:43 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9