[Sat Mar  3 15:03:00 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (352.5, 367.0) = 22 47 57.86 -51 4 50.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 67.8 +/- 13.4
  Background counts = 40.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sat Mar  3 15:03:00 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.33'
[Sat Mar  3 16:02:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar  3 16:02:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.59"
[Sat Mar  3 16:02:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.025
[Sat Mar  3 16:02:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 9.59"
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Source 16 is offset by -8.176651 and -3.934555 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.102777 x 1.102777, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9