[Sat Mar  3 15:03:00 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (337.3, 411.8) = 22 48 4.92 -51 1 35.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 94.9 +/- 14.4
  Background counts = 37.6
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Sat Mar  3 15:03:00 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.69'
[Sat Mar  3 16:02:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar  3 16:02:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.77"
[Sat Mar  3 16:02:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.016
[Sat Mar  3 16:02:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 10.77"
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:25 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:25 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:25 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 12.885535 pixels away
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar  3 17:00:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar  3 17:18:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.77 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Mar  3 17:18:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.77"
[Sat Mar  3 17:18:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.016
[Sat Mar  3 17:18:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 10.77"
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0510380101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:06 2012] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 12.907569 pixels away
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Mar  3 17:37:06 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9