[Sat Sep  8 14:14:42 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (280.4, 295.2) = 5 43 35.35 -68 23 56.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 199.7 +/- 37.3
  Background counts = 632.2
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Sat Sep  8 14:14:42 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.33'
[Sat Sep  8 14:25:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Sep  8 14:25:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.09"
[Sat Sep  8 14:25:25 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.881
[Sat Sep  8 14:25:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 7.09"
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sat Sep  8 14:37:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:28 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 7589.650000, observed total counts = 5939.000000
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:28 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 5
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.09"
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:37 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.881
[Sat Sep  8 15:15:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 7.09"
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Sat Sep  8 15:22:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506531701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep  8 15:42:26 2012] Source 5 is offset by -6.171123 and -7.291820 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.815444 x 0.815444, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Sep  8 15:42:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep  8 15:42:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep  8 15:42:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Sep  8 15:42:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep  8 15:42:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Sep  8 15:42:26 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0