[Thu Jul 12 19:43:49 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (208.5, 357.6) = 10 35 15.19 39 41 15.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 73.7 +/- 13.1
  Background counts = 53.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Thu Jul 12 19:43:49 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.81'
[Thu Jul 12 23:07:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul 12 23:07:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.33"
[Thu Jul 12 23:07:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.907
[Thu Jul 12 23:07:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 10.33"
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:45 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:45 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Thu Jul 12 23:50:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 13 01:18:54 2012] Warning: source 22 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 13.937877 pixels away
[Fri Jul 13 01:18:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 13 01:18:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 13 01:18:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 13 01:18:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 13 01:18:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 13 04:31:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.33 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jul 13 04:31:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.33"
[Fri Jul 13 04:31:17 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.907
[Fri Jul 13 04:31:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 10.33"
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Jul 13 05:05:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0506440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jul 13 06:12:36 2012] Source 10 is offset by -0.178090 and -9.022404 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.166828 x 1.166828, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jul 13 06:12:36 2012] Warning: source 18 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 13.541542 pixels away
[Fri Jul 13 06:12:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jul 13 06:12:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jul 13 06:12:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jul 13 06:12:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jul 13 06:12:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jul 13 06:12:36 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9