[Thu Nov 24 06:39:25 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (296.0, 227.0) = 4 33 43.84 -13 21 55.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 244.5 +/- 38.8
  Background counts = 625.9
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0008

[Thu Nov 24 06:39:26 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.18'
[Thu Nov 24 06:48:36 2011] Using EEF radius (= 9.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Nov 24 06:48:36 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.02"
[Thu Nov 24 06:48:36 2011] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.359
[Thu Nov 24 06:48:36 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 0, mean size = 9.02"
[Thu Nov 24 11:32:21 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0506260401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg exists
[Thu Nov 24 11:32:21 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506260401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.csv
[Thu Nov 24 11:32:21 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0506260401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg exists
[Thu Nov 24 11:32:21 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506260401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.csv
[Thu Nov 24 11:32:21 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506260401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506260401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Nov 24 11:32:23 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0506260401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists
[Thu Nov 24 11:32:23 2011] fullrun_pn_xmm0506260401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists
[Thu Nov 24 11:32:23 2011] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0506260401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58 appears to have run properly
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] Source 70 is offset by 3.806786 and -7.937784 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.816552 x 1.973697, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 6525.000000, observed total counts = 6525.000000
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 70 = 0.886278 pixels
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] 6518.349000 total counts/ 6365.120000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.920603
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 70 = 0.886278 pixels
  Position = (296.6, 226.4) = 4 33 43.65 -13 22 1.4
  Extent = 7.5 (4.1-15.2)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 153.2 +/- 80.7
  Background counts = 6365.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Nov 25 00:33:17 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0