[Fri May  4 10:28:52 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (222.3, 290.7) = 5 36 49.92 -69 16 25.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 421.1 +/- 30.6
  Background counts = 329.6
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0003

[Fri May  4 10:29:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.55'
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.20"
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.767
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 90 for pass 0, mean size = 9.20"
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3547.200000, observed total counts = 2915.000000
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 94
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source 94 is offset by -8.390263 and -2.039479 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.087094 x 1.087094, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source is confused with source 98
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.20"
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.767
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 1, mean size = 9.20"
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3564.260000, observed total counts = 2915.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 94
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3833.000000, observed total counts = 3332.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 94
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(19292.163132, 25238.681366, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src.reg
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (185, 253) - (260, 328)
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(19292.163132, 25238.681366, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21963.170395, 26379.082825, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21501.541779, 26228.800201, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18842.223282, 24743.685669, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19966.989273, 24519.120636, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19262.880814, 24594.749146, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18843.884003, 24229.087891, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18165.951477, 23706.875488, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16925.758087, 23680.357056, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20525.761000, 23425.120420, 1422.392041, 359.844010, 30.492000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17372.249054, 23284.396606, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18884.549759, 22831.894653, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19721.928741, 22827.705017, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18526.404892, 22549.136688, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22196.260000, 22692.690000, 1324.352038, 1324.352038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21266.136261, 22230.750885, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18974.191513, 22229.487091, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17540.129211, 22230.527863, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94.gif
[Sat May  5 22:51:43 2012] Mean detx,y = (-3415.21, 7671.68) 
[Sat May  5 22:51:54 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat May  5 22:52:29 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat May  5 22:52:29 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May  5 22:52:29 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 08:46:12 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May  6 08:46:12 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun May  6 11:35:46 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun May  6 11:35:46 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 11:36:02 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun May  6 11:36:02 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00385, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src94.arf
[Sun May  6 11:36:02 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun May  6 11:36:02 2012] Updating source flux to 1.7e-14
[Sun May  6 11:36:29 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting