[Fri May  4 10:28:51 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (284.0, 296.0) = 5 35 59.34 -69 16 11.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 139.7 +/- 31.7
  Background counts = 453.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Fri May  4 10:29:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.06'
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.96"
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.907
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 88 for pass 0, mean size = 6.96"
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:16:34 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4638.730000, observed total counts = 3912.000000
[Sat May  5 02:16:34 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 92
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source 92 is offset by 4.159207 and 4.619812 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.799812 x 0.799812, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source is confused with source 91
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.96"
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.907
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 83 for pass 1, mean size = 6.96"
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src83.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src83.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src83_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src83.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src83_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src83.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src83.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src83.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Warning, spatial fit 83 centroid is now closest to src. 93
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(24661.708984, 25704.187653, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_src.reg
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (247, 259) - (322, 334)
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(24661.708984, 25704.187653, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28011.582000, 25716.846200, 1577.428845, 1577.428845, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26268.637600, 23345.606000, 1168.224034, 1168.224034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23522.348297, 25520.117126, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25730.005000, 24528.367800, 1118.024032, 299.248809, 151.629000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22744.132660, 26729.305084, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21963.170395, 26379.082825, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23601.361969, 26431.132019, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22486.435516, 26153.243378, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23036.578827, 26122.097229, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25017.232000, 26076.974800, 1062.880031, 1062.880031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23955.404816, 25772.453766, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25865.902832, 24135.118439, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24853.035706, 24060.766998, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24397.716000, 23877.284000, 676.238419, 676.238419, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25004.016602, 23199.430359, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22647.420563, 22914.800598, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22196.260000, 22692.690000, 1324.352038, 1324.352038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28115.732178, 26402.558594, 1740.000000, 1740.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:04:03 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92.gif
[Sat May  5 22:47:01 2012] Mean detx,y = (-1451.44, 2672.21) 
[Sat May  5 22:47:12 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat May  5 22:47:55 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat May  5 22:47:56 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May  5 22:47:56 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 08:45:00 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May  6 08:45:00 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun May  6 11:35:46 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun May  6 11:35:46 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 11:36:01 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun May  6 11:36:01 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00163, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src92.arf
[Sun May  6 11:36:01 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun May  6 11:36:01 2012] Updating source flux to 5e-15
[Sun May  6 11:36:29 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting