[Fri May  4 10:28:50 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (262.0, 307.8) = 5 36 17.38 -69 15 18.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 239.9 +/- 32.3
  Background counts = 403.7
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Fri May  4 10:29:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.73'
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.79"
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.952
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 78 for pass 0, mean size = 7.79"
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src78.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src78.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source 82 is offset by 0.750054 and -8.308309 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.895747 x 0.895747, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source is confused with source 88
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.79"
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.952
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 73 for pass 1, mean size = 7.79"
[Sat May  5 15:53:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src73.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Warning, spatial fit 73 centroid is now closest to src. 93
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3311.520000, observed total counts = 4129.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 82
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5274.180000, observed total counts = 4345.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 82
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 16:04:02 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(22744.132660, 26729.305084, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:04:02 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src82_src.reg
[Sat May  5 16:04:02 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (224, 270) - (299, 345)
[Sat May  5 16:04:02 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(22744.132660, 26729.305084, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23522.348297, 25520.117126, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25730.005000, 24528.367800, 1118.024032, 299.248809, 151.629000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24149.326000, 30108.660000, 1323.712038, 1323.712038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21963.170395, 26379.082825, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23601.361969, 26431.132019, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22486.435516, 26153.243378, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21501.541779, 26228.800201, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23036.578827, 26122.097229, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25017.232000, 26076.974800, 1062.880031, 1062.880031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24661.708984, 25704.187653, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23955.404816, 25772.453766, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19966.989273, 24519.120636, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24853.035706, 24060.766998, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20525.761000, 23425.120420, 1422.392041, 359.844010, 30.492000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:04:02 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src82.gif
[Sat May  5 22:20:31 2012] Mean detx,y = (-3143.71, 3939.29) 
[Sat May  5 22:20:41 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat May  5 22:21:10 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat May  5 22:21:13 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src82_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May  5 22:21:13 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src82_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 08:27:19 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May  6 08:27:19 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun May  6 11:35:45 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun May  6 11:35:45 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src82_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 11:36:00 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun May  6 11:36:00 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0032, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src82.arf
[Sun May  6 11:36:00 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun May  6 11:36:00 2012] Updating source flux to 1.1e-14
[Sun May  6 11:36:29 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting