[Fri May  4 10:28:40 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (270.9, 293.9) = 5 36 10.07 -69 16 1.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 458.1 +/- 55.0
  Background counts = 438.8
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0005

[Fri May  4 10:29:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.02'
[Fri May  4 10:41:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  4 10:41:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.44"
[Fri May  4 10:41:36 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.819
[Fri May  4 10:41:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 7.44"
[Sat May  5 02:07:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:16:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 19 centroid is now closest to src. 92
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source 19 is offset by 2.659590 and 3.622450 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.841287 x 0.841287, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source is confused with source 93
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.44"
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.819
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 7.44"
[Sat May  5 15:53:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:52 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 16:03:17 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5117.500000, observed total counts = 3912.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:17 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 5274.440000, observed total counts = 4033.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:18 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 16:03:56 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(23522.348297, 25520.117126, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:03:56 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src.reg
[Sat May  5 16:03:56 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (233, 256) - (308, 331)
[Sat May  5 16:03:56 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(23522.348297, 25520.117126, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26268.637600, 23345.606000, 1168.224034, 1168.224034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25730.005000, 24528.367800, 1118.024032, 299.248809, 151.629000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22744.132660, 26729.305084, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21963.170395, 26379.082825, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23601.361969, 26431.132019, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22486.435516, 26153.243378, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21501.541779, 26228.800201, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23036.578827, 26122.097229, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25017.232000, 26076.974800, 1062.880031, 1062.880031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24661.708984, 25704.187653, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23955.404816, 25772.453766, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25865.902832, 24135.118439, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24853.035706, 24060.766998, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24397.716000, 23877.284000, 676.238419, 676.238419, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20525.761000, 23425.120420, 1422.392041, 359.844010, 30.492000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25004.016602, 23199.430359, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22647.420563, 22914.800598, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24154.760345, 22611.025421, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22196.260000, 22692.690000, 1324.352038, 1324.352038, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:03:56 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19.gif
[Sat May  5 18:21:59 2012] Mean detx,y = (-1719.37, 3763.54) 
[Sat May  5 18:22:13 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat May  5 18:23:01 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat May  5 18:23:03 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May  5 18:23:03 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 06:09:03 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May  6 06:09:03 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun May  6 11:35:40 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun May  6 11:35:40 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 11:35:53 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun May  6 11:35:53 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00419, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19.arf
[Sun May  6 11:35:53 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun May  6 11:35:53 2012] Updating source flux to 1.5e-14
[Sun May  6 11:36:29 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting