[Fri May  4 10:28:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (195.1, 272.7) = 5 37 12.31 -69 17 53.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 161.6 +/- 28.3
  Background counts = 319.7
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Fri May  4 10:29:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.72'
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.29"
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.096
[Fri May  4 10:41:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 100 for pass 0, mean size = 10.29"
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:35 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src100.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.csv
[Sat May  5 02:07:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src100.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1862.390000, observed total counts = 3245.000000
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 105
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 02:16:35 2012] Source is confused with source 108
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.29"
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.096
[Sat May  5 02:17:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 1, mean size = 10.29"
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 15:53:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists
[Sat May  5 15:53:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.csv
[Sat May  5 15:53:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 95 centroid is now closest to src. 108
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May  5 16:03:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May  5 16:04:04 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(16925.758087, 23680.357056, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:04:04 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src105_src.reg
[Sat May  5 16:04:04 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (158, 235) - (233, 310)
[Sat May  5 16:04:04 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(16925.758087, 23680.357056, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(14854.624161, 22592.076477, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17839.735831, 20436.959824, 1760.872051, 352.919808, 333.878143, X, Y) && !ellipse(16697.680200, 19849.000400, 1760.872051, 407.964812, 331.530000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16762.664000, 19955.300000, 1794.472052, 1794.472052, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19292.163132, 25238.681366, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18842.223282, 24743.685669, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19966.989273, 24519.120636, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19262.880814, 24594.749146, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18843.884003, 24229.087891, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18165.951477, 23706.875488, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17372.249054, 23284.396606, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18884.549759, 22831.894653, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19721.928741, 22827.705017, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18526.404892, 22549.136688, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19539.005188, 22049.444244, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18974.191513, 22229.487091, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18297.849350, 22053.001984, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17540.129211, 22230.527863, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19634.550400, 21357.454666, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19086.089050, 21085.241150, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17654.879578, 21177.668030, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18263.369812, 20644.266006, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May  5 16:04:04 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src105.gif
[Sat May  5 23:18:47 2012] Mean detx,y = (-3131.03, 10497.94) 
[Sat May  5 23:18:57 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat May  5 23:19:42 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat May  5 23:19:43 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src105_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May  5 23:19:43 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src105_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 09:03:36 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May  6 09:03:36 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun May  6 11:35:47 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun May  6 11:35:47 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src105_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May  6 11:36:03 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun May  6 11:36:03 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00148, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0506220101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src105.arf
[Sun May  6 11:36:03 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun May  6 11:36:03 2012] Updating source flux to 8.3e-15
[Sun May  6 11:36:29 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting