[Sun Mar 11 03:17:24 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (285.7, 260.1) = 18 22 6.87 64 19 32.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 287.4 +/- 46.5
  Background counts = 976.6
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.006

[Sun Mar 11 03:17:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.93'
[Sun Mar 11 03:22:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 11 03:22:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.89"
[Sun Mar 11 03:22:22 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.934
[Sun Mar 11 03:22:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 7.89"
[Sun Mar 11 04:08:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 04:08:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun Mar 11 04:08:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 04:08:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Sun Mar 11 04:08:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 04:08:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 04:08:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 04:08:29 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Sun Mar 11 04:26:58 2012] Source 10 is offset by -7.605697 and -6.407193 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.251448 x 7.251448, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 11 04:26:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 11 04:26:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 11 04:26:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 11 04:26:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 11 04:26:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 11 04:26:58 2012] Source is confused with source 8
[Sun Mar 11 04:27:09 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 11 04:27:09 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.89"
[Sun Mar 11 04:27:09 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.934
[Sun Mar 11 04:27:09 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 7.89"
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sun Mar 11 05:19:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:36 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:48 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(24803.142395, 22583.774200, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:48 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_src.reg
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:48 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (248, 223) - (323, 298)
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:48 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(24803.142395, 22583.774200, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26072.547000, 23840.644000, 1488.658929, 1488.658929, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25314.169159, 25619.136444, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27383.525543, 25158.523376, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27792.131897, 24729.048492, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24385.694794, 24476.069336, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24172.355225, 23800.231628, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24384.263733, 22755.610352, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23767.170000, 22446.436000, 1262.664036, 1262.664036, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Mar 11 05:39:48 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10.gif
[Sun Mar 11 06:02:01 2012] Mean detx,y = (1827.59, -457.38) 
[Sun Mar 11 06:02:05 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun Mar 11 06:02:14 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun Mar 11 06:02:14 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Mar 11 06:02:14 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun Mar 11 06:53:46 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun Mar 11 06:53:46 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Mar 11 07:56:09 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Mar 11 07:56:09 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun Mar 11 07:56:10 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Mar 11 07:56:10 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0368, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0506210701_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src10.arf
[Sun Mar 11 07:56:10 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Mar 11 07:56:10 2012] Updating source flux to 8.9e-14
[Sun Mar 11 07:56:47 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting