[Sat Jul 28 14:23:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (187.4, 463.2) = 7 9 22.13 -49 22 7.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 130.2 +/- 15.7
  Background counts = 33.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Sat Jul 28 14:23:16 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.41'
[Sat Jul 28 15:21:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul 28 15:21:45 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat Jul 28 15:21:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.63"
[Sat Jul 28 15:21:45 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.928
[Sat Jul 28 15:21:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 13.63"
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:50 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 17.508786 pixels away
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:50 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:50 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:50 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:50 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul 28 15:56:50 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jul 28 16:42:06 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jul 28 16:42:06 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Sat Jul 28 16:42:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.63"
[Sat Jul 28 16:42:06 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.928
[Sat Jul 28 16:42:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 13.63"
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0506200401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 551.567000, observed total counts = 425.000000
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:24 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jul 28 17:02:24 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9