[Thu Feb 23 23:11:58 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (271.9, 302.7) = 2 40 33.98 61 14 37.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 37.1 +/- 9.3
  Background counts = 8.7
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0008

[Thu Feb 23 23:11:59 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.95'
[Thu Feb 23 23:49:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Feb 23 23:49:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.40"
[Thu Feb 23 23:49:05 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.825
[Thu Feb 23 23:49:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 7.40"
[Fri Feb 24 00:04:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 00:04:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Feb 24 00:04:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 00:04:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Feb 24 00:04:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Feb 24 00:04:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 00:04:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 00:04:56 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly
[Fri Feb 24 00:05:06 2012] Source 4 is offset by -3.678680 and 6.487572 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.799177 x 2.799177, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Feb 24 00:05:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Feb 24 00:05:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Feb 24 00:05:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Feb 24 00:05:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Feb 24 00:05:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Feb 24 00:49:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.40 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Feb 24 00:49:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.40"
[Fri Feb 24 00:49:20 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.825
[Fri Feb 24 00:49:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 7.40"
[Fri Feb 24 01:05:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 01:05:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 01:05:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5 appears to have run properly
[Fri Feb 24 01:05:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 01:05:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 24 01:05:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly
[Fri Feb 24 01:06:01 2012] Source 4 is offset by -3.739669 and 6.487572 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.049016 x 2.430841, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Feb 24 01:06:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Feb 24 01:06:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Feb 24 01:06:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Feb 24 01:06:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Feb 24 01:06:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Feb 24 01:06:01 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9