[Sat Dec 17 00:01:44 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (267.2, 297.4) = 2 40 37.29 61 14 24.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 43.4 +/- 10.0
  Background counts = 45.5
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001

[Sat Dec 17 00:01:44 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.27'
[Sat Dec 17 00:35:19 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec 17 00:35:19 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.56"
[Sat Dec 17 00:35:19 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.549
[Sat Dec 17 00:35:19 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.56"
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:02 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:06 2011] Source 2 is offset by -2.117168 and -0.334523 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.836451 x 0.836451, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:06 2011] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 1
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:06 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:06 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:06 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:06 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec 17 00:40:06 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Dec 17 00:55:42 2011] Using EEF radius (= 7.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Dec 17 00:55:42 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.56"
[Sat Dec 17 00:55:42 2011] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.549
[Sat Dec 17 00:55:42 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 7.56"
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:30 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505981101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:33 2011] Source 2 is offset by -6.762248 and 6.310557 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.888331 x 2.888331, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:33 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:33 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:33 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:33 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:33 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Dec 17 01:00:33 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9