[Wed Feb  1 10:09:32 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (216.7, 323.9) = 0 43 24.68 41 17 27.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 108.3 +/- 15.1
  Background counts = 52.2
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0008

[Wed Feb  1 10:09:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.20'
[Wed Feb  1 10:13:05 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Feb  1 10:13:05 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.53"
[Wed Feb  1 10:13:05 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 28, mask sum = 28, frac = 0.967
[Wed Feb  1 10:13:05 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 9.53"
[Wed Feb  1 16:17:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 16:17:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Wed Feb  1 16:17:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 16:17:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Wed Feb  1 16:17:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Feb  1 16:17:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 16:17:09 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 16:17:09 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89 appears to have run properly
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:08 2012] Source 90 is offset by -0.464649 and -5.936077 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.148276 x 1.148276, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:08 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 676.997000, observed total counts = 677.000000
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:08 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 90 = 0.275514 pixels
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:08 2012] 682.689300 total counts/ 607.210000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.063080
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 90 = 0.275514 pixels
  Position = (216.8, 323.6) = 0 43 24.66 41 17 27.4
  Extent = 4.9 (3.6-7.0)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 75.5 +/- 26.1
  Background counts = 607.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:09 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9