[Wed Feb  1 10:10:02 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (350.3, 130.1) = 0 42 33.21 41 3 24.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 63.6 +/- 10.8
  Background counts = 8.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005

[Wed Feb  1 10:10:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.77'
[Wed Feb  1 19:35:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Feb  1 19:35:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.81"
[Wed Feb  1 19:35:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.032
[Wed Feb  1 19:35:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 0, mean size = 12.81"
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.csv
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src84.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src84 appears to have run properly
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Source 97 is offset by 1.172897 and -5.028107 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.426570 x 1.426570, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 166.669000, observed total counts = 166.000000
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 97 = 0.307838 pixels
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] 169.174800 total counts/ 129.341000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.502544
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 97 = 0.307838 pixels
  Position = (350.0, 130.0) = 0 42 33.33 41 3 25.4
  Extent = 5.2 (3.2-7.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 39.8 +/- 13.0
  Background counts = 129.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9