[Wed Feb  1 10:10:00 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (383.7, 450.6) = 0 42 20.15 41 26 40.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 43.1 +/- 9.2
  Background counts = 8.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Wed Feb  1 10:10:02 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.64'
[Wed Feb  1 19:35:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Feb  1 19:35:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.75"
[Wed Feb  1 19:35:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.040
[Wed Feb  1 19:35:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 0, mean size = 12.75"
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.csv
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:47 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Wed Feb  1 23:01:47 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0505720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94 appears to have run properly
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Source 71 is offset by 4.024918 and 4.856643 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.396612 x 1.396612, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 151.071000, observed total counts = 149.000000
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 71 = 0.174121 pixels
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] 150.131100 total counts/ 122.862000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.460152
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 71 = 0.174121 pixels
  Position = (383.6, 450.5) = 0 42 20.21 41 26 39.3
  Extent = 6.1 (3.2-9.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 27.3 +/- 12.3
  Background counts = 122.9
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0006
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Feb  1 23:02:41 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8