[Sat Feb 25 10:17:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (419.4, 244.0) = 0 42 6.02 41 11 33.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 67.4 +/- 15.7
  Background counts = 82.2
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Sat Feb 25 10:17:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.61'
[Sat Feb 25 10:22:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Feb 25 10:22:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.24"
[Sat Feb 25 10:22:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.947
[Sat Feb 25 10:22:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 101 for pass 0, mean size = 11.24"
[Sun Feb 26 05:58:03 2012] Source 104 is offset by 4.327002 and 5.829517 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.261814 x 1.261814, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Feb 26 05:58:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Feb 26 05:58:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Feb 26 05:58:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Feb 26 05:58:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Feb 26 05:58:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Feb 26 05:59:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Feb 26 05:59:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.24"
[Sun Feb 26 05:59:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.947
[Sun Feb 26 05:59:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 1, mean size = 11.24"
[Sun Feb 26 13:33:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 26 13:33:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.csv
[Sun Feb 26 13:33:46 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 26 13:33:46 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.csv
[Sun Feb 26 13:33:46 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src94.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Feb 26 13:33:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 26 13:33:49 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sun Feb 26 13:33:49 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0505720501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src94 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 27 00:35:59 2012] Warning: source 94 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 104 at 10.388238 pixels away
[Mon Feb 27 00:35:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 27 00:35:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 27 00:35:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Feb 27 00:35:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 27 00:35:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 27 00:35:59 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0